The petitioner failed to appear in response to the summons in a Habeas Corpus Writ Petition. In her absence, the high court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 35691 of 2010
Petitioner :- Smt. Nattho Devi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- G.R.S. Pal Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out.
None responds the call on behalf of the petitioner.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
As the petitioner is absent hence, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 24.3.2022 Mini
Digitally signed by MINI KANAUJIYA Date: 2022.03.25 16:33:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nattho Devi
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
