The Habeas Corpus Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to respond to the call after hearing the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1141 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Rinki And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds the call on behalf of petitioners.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.4.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.04.06 13:38:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rinki And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
