Dharmpal(Corpus) and Another v. State of U P and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners' counsel submitted that the Habeas Corpus writ petition became infructuous by efflux of time. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petitioners' counsel submitted that the Habeas Corpus writ petition became infructuous by efflux of time. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 138 of 2022
Petitioner :- Dharmpal(Corpus) And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandan Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is present. He submits that by the efflux of time this petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.3.2022 gp
Digitally signed by GANESH PRAKASH Date: 2022.03.09 09:14:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmpal(Corpus) And Another
State Of U P And 5 Others
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court