Petitioner sought withdrawal of an infructuous Habeas Corpus petition. The High Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Prayer for withdrawal allowed; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3742 of 2018
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramanuj Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Aadesh Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Sri Javed Alam holding brief of Sri Ramanuj Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as purpose of Habeas Corpus has been frustrated, therefore, he wants to withdraw this petition.
Prayer is allowed.
The Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as being infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.3.2022 Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.03.09 10:48:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar Shukla
Another
State Of U.P.
5 Others
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
