No. 116 of 2020 was heard via revised list where the petitioner did not appear. The learned Additional Advocate General for the State appeared and the record was perused.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 116 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Iram Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mashaluddin Shah Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of petitioner.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
As nobody appears to press this Petition on behalf of petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.4.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.04.13 12:33:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Iram Bano
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
