Arman v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Habeas Corpus writ petition dismissed for lack of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Order signed by Extra Acting Chief Justice Ved Prakash Sharma.
Habeas Corpus writ petition dismissed for lack of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Order signed by Extra Acting Chief Justice Ved Prakash Sharma.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 500 of 2019
Petitioner :- Arman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds the call on behalf of petitioner.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.4.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.04.12 14:14:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arman
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
Ved Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court