Habeas Corpus petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement of dispute via compromise between parties, informed by respondent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 103 of 2020 Petitioner :- Savitry@ Seema Pondey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaishankar Prasad Tyagi,Lallan Chaubey,Sonu Nirmal
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Jai Shanker Upadhyay,Karuna Kant Updhyay,Neelkant Upadhyay Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
None present on behalf of petitioner to press this petition.
Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 informed that parties have settled their dispute through compromise hence, this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.4.2022 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY Date: 2022.04.08 14:28:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Savitry@ Seema Pondey
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
Vinod Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
