The Habeas Corpus Writ Petition was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel did not appear to press the case, resulting in want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1017 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Varsha Sharma Corpus And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Kuldeep Kumar Dixit,Prem Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds the call on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned AGA for the state and perused the record.
As nobody is present to press this petition, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 28.3.2022 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY Date: 2022.03.29 10:58:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Varsha Sharma
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
