The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition and a delay condonation application due to non-appearance by the revisionist, citing want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 79 of 2003
Revisionist :- Prem Singh Opposite Party :- Nem Singh And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.P. Singh Rajpoot Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 34967 of 2002
None appeared on behalf of applicant/revisionist to press this application even in revised call.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order on Memo of revision
Consequently, revision petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.11.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.11.18 12:11:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nem Singh
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
