In a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., the High Court, perusing the record, found no manifest error or illegality and dismissed the revision petition filed by the revisionist against the Sessions judgement acquitting the opposite parties.
Cr. Rev. No. 932 of 2002 dismissed; Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 932 of 2002
Revisionist :- Yuvraj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajul Bhargava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 17.11.2022 AK
Digitally signed by AWADESH KUMAR Date: 2022.11.17 15:52:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court's acquittal of the opposite parties under Section 396 IPC warrants interference under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
