Criminal revision dismissed as withdrawn by the revisionist, who sought liberty to file a fresh revision, without adjudicating substantive defects. No specific relief beyond withdrawal and restoration of papers was granted.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh; certified copies to be returned after retaining photocopy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 45 of 2022
Revisionist :- Sunil @ Savarwa Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ravindra Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that due to certain defects, he wants to withdraw the present revision with liberty to file a fresh.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Let certified copies of the papers be returned to the counsel for revisionist after retaining its photocopy.
Order Date :- 28.3.2022 Anil K. Sharma
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2022.03.28 17:47:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil @ Savarwa
State of U.P.
Another
Mohd. Aslam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
