The Hon'ble Court, having perused the record in the absence of the revisionist, found no manifest error in the trial court's acquittal and dismissed the criminal revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C., vacating any interim order.
The criminal revision was dismissed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 868 of 2005
Revisionist :- Nawal Kishore Singh Kishwaha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Amod Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 12.10.2022
Deepika
Digitally signed by DEEPIKA SINGH Date: 2022.10.18 12:40:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. merits interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nawal Kishore Singh Kishwaha
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
