Single Judge granted criminal revision challenging order framing charges under Section 272 IPC for manufacturing/spurious liquor. Court held chemical detection of urea makes liquor noxious upholding framing of charges.
Criminal revision dismissed upholding order framing charges against accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 647 of 2022
Revisionist :- Ramanand Nishad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Arvind Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
at the most could be proceeded only under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006
Order Date :- 17.11.2022
Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.11.24 09:10:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether dismissal of Section 227 Cr.P.C. application and posting for framing of charges under Section 272 IPC is reversible when chemical evidence shows presence of urea making liquor noxious.
Whether police lack power to proceed under Section 272 IPC even if conduct falls under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006.
Whether roving enquiry is permissible at the stage of framing of charges when accused claims false implication.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
