The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision petition as not pressed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, in accordance with the applicant's counsel's statement. No other relief or substantial adjudication was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3659 of 2021
Revisionist :- Sanjay Sharma @ Sunil Sharma And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Dinesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
After some argument, learned counsel for the revisionists states that he does not want to press this revision, as such it may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
In view of the above, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to counsel for the revisionists as per Rules.
Order Date :- 24.5.2022 KU
Digitally signed by KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI Date: 2022.05.24 14:52:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Sharma @ Sunil Sharma And 6 Others
State of U.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
