The High Court dismissed a criminal revision for non-prosecution. The appellant failed to appear for admission of the petition despite being listed, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3416 of 2008
Revisionist :- Roop Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Virendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Perusal of the record discloses that the revision is pending for admission but none is present for the revisionist even in the revised list to press the revision on the stage of admission.
In view of above, the revision is dismissed for non-prosecution at the stage of admission.
Lower Court record be transmitted to the court concerned. Order Date :- 18.11.2022 Mohit
Digitally signed by MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.11.19 10:15:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Roop Kumar
State of U.P.
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
