Revision filed by an acquitted accused. Petitioner withdrew the revision as the trial resulted in acquittal, rendering the appeal infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3208 of 2021
Revisionist :- Raj @ Raj Kamal Maurya (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A,Virendra Nath Upadhyay
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State, are present.
At the very outset, it is submitted on behalf of the revisionist that the trial against him proceeded and he stands acquitted by the court concerned. Hence, he no more desires to press this revision.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.11.2022 Vik/-
Digitally signed by VIKRAM GUPTA Date: 2022.11.11 17:43:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj @ Raj Kamal Maurya
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
