Revision dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist's counsel failed to appear despite the date being listed in the interest of justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3120 of 2009
Revisionist :- Jasmunnisha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Jokhan Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the revisionist.
Lower court record has been received.
The case is pending for hearing on admission.
The case was adjourned on 26.09.2022 in the interest of justice in the absence of learned counsel for the revisionist.
Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.11.2022 KS
Digitally signed by KISHAN SINHA Date: 2022.11.18 18:50:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
