Hon'ble Mon. Shamim Ahmed, J., dismissed Criminal Revision No. 20 of 2001 filed by Shankar Lal against an order of the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh, holding no illegality or infirmity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 20 of 2001 Revisionist :- Shankar Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Rajneesh Saxena, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Suresh Bahadur Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
This revision has been filed against the order dated 22.11.2000 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No. 796 of 1994.
Shri Vinod Kant submits that the present revision is of the year, 2001 and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
After having gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perusal of the record and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the revisionist and learned Additional Advocate General, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 9.3.2022 Arvind
Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.03.11 17:23:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed by the lower court in Sessions Trial No. 796 of 1994 suffers from any illegality or infirmity warranting interference in criminal revision.
Shankar Lal
State of U.P.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
