In this criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. by the appellant challenging an order rejecting her application to summon additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., the High Court found no manifest error or illegality and dismissed the revision.
Criminal Revision dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 17 of 2018
Revisionist :- Smt. Rekha Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,K.K. Tripathi
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 SB
Digitally signed by SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA Date: 2022.09.14 17:50:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any manifest error or illegality to warrant interference in the revision rejecting the application for summoning additional accused.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rekha Shukla
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
