This judgment dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition due to the non-appearance of the petitioner even in a revised call, resulting in the matter being dismissed for want of prosecution.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21312 of 2010
Petitioner :- Shakeel Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- M.H. Khan,Arvind Srivastava,Imran Mabood Khan,Sharad Mandhan Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
None appears on behalf of petitioner even in revised call.
In view of above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.09.14 17:38:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakeel Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
