High Court in criminal revision No. 1521 of 1993 dismissed the revision directed against an order of acquittal due to efflux of time and absence of the revisionist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1521 of 1993
Revisionist :- Raj Pal And Others Opposite Party :- State And Aothers Counsel for Revisionist :- V.K. Kjaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.
Sri Suresh Bahadur Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision is directed against the order of acquittal.
Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 1993 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s) under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 11.3.2022 SA
Digitally signed by SALMAN ALI Date: 2022.03.15 14:09:04 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Pal And Others
State And Aothers
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
