Anil Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 1745 of 1992 due to efflux of time and lack of representation by the revisionist, finding no illegality in the impugned orders.
What the court decided
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1745 of 1992
Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- G N Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 1992 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1745/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court