The High Court at Allahabad dismissed the Criminal Revision as withdrawn because the revisionist counsel stated an intention to file an appeal.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1489 of 2022
Revisionist :- Vikas Sharma And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Shubham Prakash Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
At the outset, Sri Mukesh Chandra, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he intends to file an appeal against the impugned order, and as such, the present revision may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the statement made above, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Registry is directed to return certified copy of impugned order to the counsel for the revisionist after accepting xerox of the same.
Order Date :- 13.5.2022
Ajeet
Digitally signed by AJEET KUMAR PATEL Date: 2022.05.13 17:16:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikas Sharma And Another
State of U.P. and Another
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
