The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging an order of acquittal. The court found no error of law, fact, or evidence requiring interference.
The criminal revision is dismissed as the trial court's order contained no error of law, fact or evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 138 of 2009
Revisionist :- Smt. Premwati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 20.5.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.05.24 18:10:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned trial court committed any error of law, fact or evidence in acquitting the accused under Sections 363, 366 and 376 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Premwati
State of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
