In this criminal revision, the High Court reviewed the acquittal of accused respondents charged under Sections 376 and 504 IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge. Finding no error of law, fact, or evidence, the Court dismissed the revision.
The criminal revision filed under Section 397 CrPC was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 25 of 2008
Revisionist :- Gaya Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- V.K. Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Akhilesh Pandey,Raghvendra Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 19.5.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.05.19 18:38:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court committed any error of law, fact or evidence requiring interference under revisional jurisdiction regarding the acquittal of accused respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaya Prasad
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
