Dismissed

Khushi Ram Upadhyay v. State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad HC23 Mar 2022CRLR/120/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision against an acquittal, the High Court dismissed the petition after finding no illegality in the lower court's order and noting the revisionist's interest had lapsed due to efflux of time. The direction was to transmit the order for compliance.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision petition was dismissed with a direction to transmit the order to the lower courts for compliance.

Khushi Ram Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. and Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 93

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 120 of 2001

¶3

Revisionist :- Khushi Ram Upadhyay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shyam Bahadur Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

¶4

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶5

List has been revised.

¶6

None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.

¶7

Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶8

This revision is directed against the order of acquittal.

¶9

Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 2001 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

¶10

I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.

¶11

In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s) under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.

¶12

Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.

¶13

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.

¶14

The file is consigned to record.

¶15

Lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 23.3.2022 SA

¶17

Digitally signed by SALMAN ALI Date: 2022.03.25 12:31:24 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khushi Ram Upadhyay v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khushi Ram Upadhyay v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and Another

Harshit Kesharwani Vs State of U.P. and Another

X (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Megh Nath Vs State of U.P. and Others

Satnam Singh Alias Satta Vs State of U.P. and Others

Smt. Sharda Devi Vs State of U.P. and Others