The High Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 101 of 2001 against an order of acquittal, noting no illegality in the lower court's judgment and citing the lapse of time and lack of appearance by the revisionist.
The criminal revision petition is dismissed without interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 101 of 2001
Revisionist :- Megh Nath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Radhey Shyam Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.
Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision is directed against the order of acquittal.
Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 2001 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s) under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 23.3.2022 SA
Digitally signed by SALMAN ALI Date: 2022.03.25 12:32:12 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Megh Nath
State of U.P.
SHAMIM AHMED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
