Abdul Rab v. Jai Prakash and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8825 of 2006
Petitioner :- Abdul Rab Respondent :- Jai Prakash And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.C. Mandhyan,Madhav Mani Tripathi,Om Prakash
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Moti Lal,Neeraj Agarwal,Rama Kant Mishra,Smt. Meera
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Heard Sri Om Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Neeraj Agarwal, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Arvind Kumar, learned AGA, for the State.
Sri Om Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view thereof, the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.5.2022 SKM
Digitally signed by SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.05.20 09:36:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rab
Jai Prakash
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court