Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the allegation against the applicant in the present case is that he stopped the payment of cheque which was issued by him to opposite party No. 2. He further submitted that the cheque was issued for the purpose to execute the sale deed in respect of land in question in favour of applicant but when opposite party No. 2 did not agree to execute the sale deed in favour of the applicant, therefore, he stopped the payment of the cheque in dispute. Learned counsel further submitted that actually applicant issued four cheques in favour of opposite party No. 2, out which three cheques have already honoured and further submitted that when opposite party No. 2 failed to execute the sale deed in favour of the applicant then applicant also lodged an FIR against him on 3.8.2019 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 387 and 120B IPC, therefore, the impugned complaint filed by the applicant is not maintainable and it is based on false & fabricated facts and court below without analyzing the facts of the case, in routine manner passed the summoning order against the applicant.
