The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 837 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ajay Singhal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Amit Kumar,Prateek Tyagi
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even when the matter is taken up in the revised list. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 8.8.2022 Sazia
Digitally signed by SAZIA AQUIL Date: 2022.08.10 16:49:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Singhal
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
