This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because twelve of the eighteen petitioners had been charge-sheeted while a final report was filed in favour of the remaining seven.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 703 of 2022
Petitioner :- Qamaruddin Alias Jodhan And 17 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Puneet Bhadauria Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has stated that the petition is on behalf of eighteen petitioners. Eleven of them have been charge sheeted while a final report has been filed in favour of the remaining seven.
In view of the statement so made, which is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioners, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 16.2.2022 Meenu
Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.02.17 10:55:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Qamaruddin Alias Jodhan And 17 Others
State Of U P And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
