The writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the FIR was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite repeated calls.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 594 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mukammil And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List of cases shown in the fresh list have been revised.
Despite repeated calls none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition. The First Information Report otherwise contains, prima facie, the allegation with regard to cognizable offence in the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.3.2022 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by HASEENUDDIN Date: 2022.03.08 13:27:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukammil And 3 Others
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
