This judgment records a brief order where the writ petition was rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. The court dismissed the petition without any further discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2259 of 2022
Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akarsh Dwivedi,Sheeladitya Harshvardhan
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of subsequent development, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous and, therefore, petitioner is no longer desirous of pressing this petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 7.3.2022
Haseen U.
Digitally signed by HASEENUDDIN Date: 2022.03.08 13:27:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
