In the absence of the petitioner to press the criminal miscellaneous writ petition despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and discharged any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 543 of 2021
Petitioner :- Baseer Alias Nanhaku Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitala Sahay Srivastav,Hari Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even when the matter is taken up in the revised list. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 8.8.2022 Sazia
Digitally signed by SAZIA AQUIL Date: 2022.08.10 16:49:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Baseer Alias Nanhaku
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
