The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition on the prayer by the counsel to withdraw it, marking that the writ petition was dismissed based on the claimed desire to pursue remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
No relief granted; merely dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4011 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sanjeev Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Farid Ahmed Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Jayant Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
After some argument, learned counsel comes up with a prayer to withdraw the petition to pursue the remedies available under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.4.2022 SK Goswami
Digitally signed by SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI Date: 2022.04.20 09:33:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjeev Yadav
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
