Pankaj Maurya v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an expiring externment order. Court held no grievance survives as the order had already outlived its term. Writ petition dismissed.
Petitioner challenged an expiring externment order. Court held no grievance survives as the order had already outlived its term. Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3652 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pankaj Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gokaran Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
The order of externment with which the petitioner is primarily aggrieved has already out lived its term. No further grievance, therefore survives which may require any examination by this court.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 6.4.2022 Banswar
Digitally signed by RAM NARESH BANSWAR Date: 2022.04.06 16:45:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pankaj Maurya
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
Banswar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court