The High Court dismissed this writ petition concerning a Section 125 Cr.P.C. matrimonial dispute as infructuous due to lapse of time and lack of prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 35 of 2003
Petitioner :- Rama Shanker Chauhan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The writ petition has been filed with regard to under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The dispute is matrimonial in nature.
It seems that due to lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous and the petitioner has no interest.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.11.2022 MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.11.14 17:30:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Shanker Chauhan
State of U.P.
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
