The petition appeared on a revised list but no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution.
Petitioner did not appear; petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3024 of 2022
Petitioner :- Balvinder Kaur @ Neela Gayakwad @ Neela Jivan Gayakwad And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lal Mani Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.3.2022 Md Faisal
Digitally signed by MOHD FAISAL Date: 2022.03.25 17:14:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Balvinder Kaur @ Neela Gayakwad @ Neela Jivan Gayakwad And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
