Writ petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed. The learned counsel for the informant noted the rejection of bail by the Sessions Court, leading petitioners to withdraw the writ petition to pursue alternative remedy under CrPC.
Petitioners discharged of all consequences of this order; liberty to pursue remedy under CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2939 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ramji Lal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nasiruzzaman,Mohit Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Saksham Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant points out that the petitioner's application for grant of Anticipatory Bail has been rejected by Sessions Judge, Aligarh on 21.2.2022, which fact is not disclosed in the petition.
Faced with above objection, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with the prayer to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to pursue his remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Writ petition, accordingly, is dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.3.2022 n.u.
Digitally signed by NASEEM UDDIN Date: 2022.03.23 14:08:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramji Lal And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
