The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as none of the petitioners appeared despite repeated calls. The interim order stands discharged.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 25678 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Ali And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Ashok Kumar Tripathi,Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of petitioners to press the writ petition.
Writ petition, accordingly, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 25.2.2022 Anil
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR PATEL Date: 2022.02.25 16:19:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Ali And 5 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
