The high court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. Any interim order stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 25031 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Pyare Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition.
Writ petition, accordingly, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 25.2.2022 Anil
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR PATEL Date: 2022.02.25 16:19:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Pyare Yadav
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
