Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners were absent from the call and did not press the matter. Interim order vacated.
Vacature of any interim order and dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2351 of 2020
Petitioner :- Anshul Sharma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Case is called out. None present for the petitioners to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.9.2022 ML
Digitally signed by MUNNA LAL Date: 2022.09.16 09:42:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anshul Sharma And Another
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Narendra Kumar Johari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
