Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the matter even after a revised call. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1322 of 2020
Petitioner :- Azad Bansal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Case is called out. None present for the petitioner to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.9.2022 ML
Digitally signed by MUNNA LAL Date: 2022.09.16 09:40:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Azad Bansal
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Narendra Kumar Johari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
