Petitioners sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy. Respondents had no objection. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2066 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mool Chand And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Dubey,Manoj Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Manoj Kumar Tripathi,Rama Shankar Mishra
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with the prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy, as may be available to petitioners in accordance with law.
Sri Rama Shankar Mishra and Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi appearing for the respondents have no objection.
Dismissed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 23.3.2022 Anil
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR PATEL Date: 2022.03.23 16:19:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mool Chand And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 9 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
