Criminal Misc. Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's absence and inability to justify interference after reviewing pleadings and grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13080 of 2006
Petitioner :- Hari Shankar Upadhyay Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one is present on behalf of petitioner to press this petition. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter is an old one pending since 2006.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that the petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.4.2022 S.Ali
Digitally signed by SHAUKAT ALI Date: 2022.04.06 10:44:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Shankar Upadhyay
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
