The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the charge-sheet had already been forwarded to the competent court on 17.8.2022, rendering the relief sought unnecessary.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11541 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Ramanlata And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manvendra Singh,Pramod Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Shiv Sagar Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
At the very outset, Sri G.P.Singh, learned AGA states that in the present matter, charge-sheet has been forwarded to the competent court on 17.8.2022, as such, the writ petition itself rendered infructuous.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous in terms of the aforesaid.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 A.K.Srivastava
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.09.15 11:00:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Ramanlata And 2 Others
State Of U P And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Narendra Kumar Johari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
