Harpal and Others v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant's counsel was absent. Since the original parties in the appeal have died, the appeal abated and was dismissed.
What the court decided
Court No. - 89 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 245 of 2002 Appellant :- Harpal And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Amar Nath Srivastava,Neeraj Kumar Srivastava,Pankaj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Case called out. No one has appeared on behalf of the appellants.
As per the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut dated 25.10.2021, appellant no. 1 Harpal Singh, appellant no. 2 Krishna Pal and appellant no. 3 Naresh have died.
In view of the aforesaid report, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022 RC
Digitally signed by RAM CHANDER YADAV Date: 2022.08.05 12:26:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Harpal
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/245/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court