Amar Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Jail appeal against conviction for abducting and raping a minor girl. High Court held prosecution failed due to inconsistent testimonies, lack of forensic evidence, and non-production of key witnesses, leading to acquittal.
What did the court decide?
Judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 7.7.2011 set aside; appellant acquitted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 89 A.F.R.
Case :- JAIL APPEAL No. - 5100 of 2011 Appellant :- Amar Singh Respondent :- State
Counsel for Appellant :- Vikram Bahadur Singh, Amicus Curuae Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Shrawan Kumar Ojha (A.G.A.)
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Present jail appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 7.7.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Kanpur Nagar whereby the accused appellant Amar Singh has been convicted and sentenced under section 366 I.P.C. to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- and under section 376 I.P.C. for seven years R.I. and fine of Rs.3,000/-, with default provision in each of the offences. The appellant has been acquitted of the charge under section 363 I.P.C.
2. Heard Mr. Vikram Bahadur Singh, learned amicus curiae, appearing for the appellant and Mr. Shrawan Kumar Ojha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
3. The prosecution case is that the complainant Bablu, P.W. 1 lives in Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur in a hut and carries on the business of selling eggs for livelihood. Amar Singh, the present appellant works in Arya Nagar karkhana. He also lives in Swaroop Nagar. On 22.3.2010, Amar Singh enticed away
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt given inconsistencies in testimony and lack of corroboration.
Whether the withholding of available material witnesses casts an adverse inference against the prosecution.
Whether the uncertain place and time of occurrencecreates serious doubt regarding the reliability of the version of events.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amar Singh
- respondent
State
Coram
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- JAPL/5100/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court