It was reported that the appellant, Nanhu Alias Rahul, died on October 21, 2021. The High Court held that the criminal appeal stood abated consequent to his death and disposed of the matter accordingly.
The criminal appeal was disposed of as abated due to the death of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.346
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1902 of 1998
Nanhu Alias Rahul
.....Appellant
v/s
State of U.P. .....Respondent
Through :- Mr. Syed Ali Murtaza, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 08.04.2022 Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by KULDEEP SINGH Date: 2022.04.16 11:37:54 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal appeal stands abated upon the death of the appellant.
Nanhu Alias Rahul
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
