Khalil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the criminal appeal abated as the appellant Khalil died. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of and the lower court record directed to be returned.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of as abated.
What the court decided
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 345
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1125 of 1998
Khalil
.....Appellant
v/s
State of U.P.
.....Respondent
Through :- Mr. Syed Ali Murtaza, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
- Vide report dated October 30, 2021 submitted by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut the sole appellant, namely, Khalil is reported to have died. The appeal, therefore, stands abated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Khalil
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1125/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court